[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1396368657.3681.17.camel@linaro1.home>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:10:57 +0100
From: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>
Subject: Bug(?) in patch "arm64: Implement coherent DMA API based on
swiotlb" (was Re: [GIT PULL] arm64 patches for 3.15)
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 18:52 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> The following changes since commit cfbf8d4857c26a8a307fb7cd258074c9dcd8c691:
>
> Linux 3.14-rc4 (2014-02-23 17:40:03 -0800)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux tags/arm64-upstream
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 196adf2f3015eacac0567278ba538e3ffdd16d0e:
>
> arm64: Remove pgprot_dmacoherent() (2014-03-24 10:35:35 +0000)
I may have spotted a bug in commit 7363590d2c46 (arm64: Implement
coherent DMA API based on swiotlb), see my inline comment below...
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/cache.S b/arch/arm64/mm/cache.S
> index 1ea9f26..97fcef5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/cache.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/cache.S
> @@ -166,3 +166,81 @@ ENTRY(__flush_dcache_area)
> dsb sy
> ret
> ENDPROC(__flush_dcache_area)
> +
> +/*
> + * __dma_inv_range(start, end)
> + * - start - virtual start address of region
> + * - end - virtual end address of region
> + */
> +__dma_inv_range:
> + dcache_line_size x2, x3
> + sub x3, x2, #1
> + bic x0, x0, x3
> + bic x1, x1, x3
Why is the 'end' value in x1 above rounded down to be cache aligned?
This means the cache invalidate won't include the cache line containing
the final bytes of the region, unless it happened to already be cache
line aligned. This looks especially suspect as the other two cache
operations added in the same patch (below) don't do that.
> +1: dc ivac, x0 // invalidate D / U line
> + add x0, x0, x2
> + cmp x0, x1
> + b.lo 1b
> + dsb sy
> + ret
> +ENDPROC(__dma_inv_range)
> +
> +/*
> + * __dma_clean_range(start, end)
> + * - start - virtual start address of region
> + * - end - virtual end address of region
> + */
> +__dma_clean_range:
> + dcache_line_size x2, x3
> + sub x3, x2, #1
> + bic x0, x0, x3
> +1: dc cvac, x0 // clean D / U line
> + add x0, x0, x2
> + cmp x0, x1
> + b.lo 1b
> + dsb sy
> + ret
> +ENDPROC(__dma_clean_range)
> +
> +/*
> + * __dma_flush_range(start, end)
> + * - start - virtual start address of region
> + * - end - virtual end address of region
> + */
> +ENTRY(__dma_flush_range)
> + dcache_line_size x2, x3
> + sub x3, x2, #1
> + bic x0, x0, x3
> +1: dc civac, x0 // clean & invalidate D / U line
> + add x0, x0, x2
> + cmp x0, x1
> + b.lo 1b
> + dsb sy
> + ret
> +ENDPROC(__dma_flush_range)
[...]
--
Tixy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists