[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140401180414.GA12326@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 14:04:14 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rcu_prempt stalls / lockup
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 10:55:45AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > so kernel space still works like before, but userspace is locked up.
> > >
> > > Interesting. I suspect that if you reverted the rest of this merge
> > > window's RCU patches, you would get the same result.
Something that occurred to me is that this might be something in the x86 merge
that's just changing timings enough to expose this problem.
At some point this evening, I'll try bisecting it if we don't get any closer.
> > [ 1953.672735] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start, gp_kthread state: 0x2
> > [ 2148.608132] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
> > [ 2148.609140] (detected by 0, t=104027 jiffies, g=47728, c=47727, q=0)
> > etc etc.
>
> Waiting uninterruptibly. Presumably blocked on mutex_lock(). But
> you have CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING(), so any deadlocks should have been
> reported.
Lockdep had reported something a little earlier (timestamped at 1108.xxxxxx)
but that's a known false-positive in xfs.
> Given that you have CONFIG_RCU_TRACE=y, could you please enable the
> following trace events and dump the trace before things hang?
>
> trace_event=rcu:rcu_grace_period,rcu:rcu_grace_period_init
>
> If it is not feasible to dump the trace before things hang, let me
> know, and I will work out some other diagnostic regime.
I'll give that a shot when I get back in a few hours.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists