| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 19:55:35 +0100
From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Davies <Jonathan.Davies@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] xen-netback: Grant copy the header instead
of map and memcpy
On 01/04/14 10:40, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-
>> netback/netback.c
>> index e781366..ba11ff5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> @@ -915,35 +915,30 @@ static inline void xenvif_grant_handle_reset(struct
>> xenvif *vif,
>>
>> static int xenvif_tx_check_gop(struct xenvif *vif,
>> struct sk_buff *skb,
>> - struct gnttab_map_grant_ref **gopp_map)
>> + struct gnttab_map_grant_ref **gopp_map,
>> + struct gnttab_copy **gopp_copy)
>> {
>> struct gnttab_map_grant_ref *gop_map = *gopp_map;
>> u16 pending_idx = XENVIF_TX_CB(skb)->pending_idx;
>> struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
>> - struct pending_tx_info *tx_info;
>> int nr_frags = shinfo->nr_frags;
>> - int i, err, start;
>> + int i, err;
>> struct sk_buff *first_skb = NULL;
>>
>> /* Check status of header. */
>> - err = gop_map->status;
>> + err = (*gopp_copy)->status;
>> + (*gopp_copy)++;
>
> I guess there's no undo work in the case of a copy op so you can bump the copy count here, but it might have been nicer to pair it with the update to the map count.
I rather prefer to group related operations on the same variable to stay
close to each other.
>> @@ -1067,9 +1051,9 @@ static int xenvif_get_extras(struct xenvif *vif,
>>
>> memcpy(&extra, RING_GET_REQUEST(&vif->tx, cons),
>> sizeof(extra));
>> + vif->tx.req_cons = ++cons;
>> if (unlikely(!extra.type ||
>> extra.type >= XEN_NETIF_EXTRA_TYPE_MAX)) {
>> - vif->tx.req_cons = ++cons;
>> netdev_err(vif->dev,
>> "Invalid extra type: %d\n", extra.type);
>> xenvif_fatal_tx_err(vif);
>> @@ -1077,7 +1061,6 @@ static int xenvif_get_extras(struct xenvif *vif,
>> }
>>
>> memcpy(&extras[extra.type - 1], &extra, sizeof(extra));
>> - vif->tx.req_cons = ++cons;
>
> I know you called this out as unrelated, but I still think it would be better in a separate patch.
Ok
>> @@ -1269,24 +1255,39 @@ static unsigned xenvif_tx_build_gops(struct
>> xenvif *vif, int budget)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - xenvif_tx_create_gop(vif, pending_idx, &txreq, gop);
>> -
>> - gop++;
>> -
>> XENVIF_TX_CB(skb)->pending_idx = pending_idx;
>>
>> __skb_put(skb, data_len);
>> + vif->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].source.u.ref = txreq.gref;
>> + vif->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].source.domid = vif->domid;
>> + vif->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].source.offset = txreq.offset;
>> +
>> + vif->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].dest.u.gmfn =
>> + virt_to_mfn(skb->data);
>> + vif->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].dest.domid = DOMID_SELF;
>> + vif->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].dest.offset =
>> + offset_in_page(skb->data);
>> +
>> + vif->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].len = data_len;
>> + vif->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].flags =
>> GNTCOPY_source_gref;
>> +
>> + (*copy_ops)++;
>>
>> skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags = ret;
>> if (data_len < txreq.size) {
>> skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags++;
>> frag_set_pending_idx(&skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0],
>> pending_idx);
>> + xenvif_tx_create_gop(vif, pending_idx, &txreq,
>> gop);
>> + gop++;
>> } else {
>> frag_set_pending_idx(&skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0],
>> INVALID_PENDING_IDX);
>> + memcpy(&vif->pending_tx_info[pending_idx].req,
>> &txreq,
>> + sizeof(txreq));
>> }
>>
>> +
>
> Unnecessary whitespace change.
Ok
>
>> vif->pending_cons++;
>>
>> request_gop = xenvif_get_requests(vif, skb, txfrags, gop);
>> @@ -1301,11 +1302,13 @@ static unsigned xenvif_tx_build_gops(struct
>> xenvif *vif, int budget)
>>
>> vif->tx.req_cons = idx;
>>
>> - if ((gop-vif->tx_map_ops) >= ARRAY_SIZE(vif-
>>> tx_map_ops))
>> + if (((gop-vif->tx_map_ops) >= ARRAY_SIZE(vif-
>>> tx_map_ops)) ||
>> + (*copy_ops >= ARRAY_SIZE(vif->tx_map_ops)))
>
> Do you mean ARRAY_SIZE(vif->tx_copy_ops) here?
Yes, I'll correct it.
>
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> - return gop - vif->tx_map_ops;
>> + (*map_ops) = gop - vif->tx_map_ops;
>> + return;
>> }
>>
>> /* Consolidate skb with a frag_list into a brand new one with local pages on
>> @@ -1377,6 +1380,7 @@ static int xenvif_handle_frag_list(struct xenvif *vif,
>> struct sk_buff *skb)
>> static int xenvif_tx_submit(struct xenvif *vif)
>> {
>> struct gnttab_map_grant_ref *gop_map = vif->tx_map_ops;
>> + struct gnttab_copy *gop_copy = vif->tx_copy_ops;
>> struct sk_buff *skb;
>> int work_done = 0;
>>
>> @@ -1389,7 +1393,7 @@ static int xenvif_tx_submit(struct xenvif *vif)
>> txp = &vif->pending_tx_info[pending_idx].req;
>>
>> /* Check the remap error code. */
>> - if (unlikely(xenvif_tx_check_gop(vif, skb, &gop_map))) {
>> + if (unlikely(xenvif_tx_check_gop(vif, skb, &gop_map,
>> &gop_copy))) {
>> netdev_dbg(vif->dev, "netback grant failed.\n");
>
> It could have been the copy that failed. You should probably change the error message.
I've changed it to "netback grant op failed.\n"
>> @@ -1588,22 +1588,26 @@ static inline void xenvif_tx_dealloc_action(struct
>> xenvif *vif)
>> /* Called after netfront has transmitted */
>> int xenvif_tx_action(struct xenvif *vif, int budget)
>> {
>> - unsigned nr_mops;
>> + unsigned nr_mops, nr_cops = 0;
>> int work_done, ret;
>>
>> if (unlikely(!tx_work_todo(vif)))
>> return 0;
>>
>> - nr_mops = xenvif_tx_build_gops(vif, budget);
>> + xenvif_tx_build_gops(vif, budget, &nr_cops, &nr_mops);
>>
>> - if (nr_mops == 0)
>> + if (nr_cops == 0)
>> return 0;
>> -
>> - ret = gnttab_map_refs(vif->tx_map_ops,
>> - NULL,
>> - vif->pages_to_map,
>> - nr_mops);
>> - BUG_ON(ret);
>> + else {
>
> Do you need an 'else' here? Unless I'm misreading the diff your previous clause returns.
Indeed, it's not necessary there
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists