linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] Devicetree changes for v3.15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1396384443.23763.24.camel@x220>
Date:	Tue, 01 Apr 2014 22:34:03 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] Devicetree changes for v3.15

On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 15:18 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:
> > That commit leaves a select for PROC_DEVICETREE dangling. See "config
> > ARCH_OMAP2PLUS" in arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig. Can that select
> > statement just be dropped now or is something more elaborate needed?
> 
> Yes, it can and should be dropped. It never should have been there to
> begin with. It should be a user selectable option, not a platform
> selection.

Should I draft a (trivial) patch to drop it or would you like to do
that? (Your commit explanation will probably end up more useful.)


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/