[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH+eYFCwBepjaM+XfqqgVaHMp6N5+Yad3oaR0tezqSeW7ODuRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 01:21:01 +0200
From: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: don't allow CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX if
CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL is enabled
2014-04-01 20:36 GMT+02:00 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> On 4/1/2014 3:04 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX sounds like a nice security feature, but
>>> things might fail late (and unexpected) if module code is set to read-only
>>> while CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL is enabled (e.g. modprobe bridge).
>
> Isn't this a ordering problem? I thought jump labels got set up once,
> and then after that, the memory could be made RO?
The code gets patched every time the jump label is enabled/disabled,
i.e. every time the static_key is turned on/off based on
static_key_slow_{inc/dec}()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists