[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7ch-ZBYRHmhbHJEXQtS-V_kBPK5nMhtM3bPbHmnY+m-EeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 08:31:04 +0000
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: About 'hash' event trigger patchset
Hi Tom,
(Sorry for replying in another thread, I have a problem on mail settings)
I've just read your hash event trigger series, and want to give some feedback.
At first, the change log of 5/5 is actually a better documentation
than in patch 4/5 so I think it should be added to the doc also. But
the syntax of the hash trigger should be look like:
- # echo hash:key(s):value(s)[:sort_keys()][ if filter] > event/trigger
+ # echo hash:key(s):value(s)[:"sort="sort_key(s)][ if filter] > event/trigger
Also on first example in the changelog of 5/5, key should be
'stacktrace' instead of 'call_site'.
As far as I see in the code, the sort key can receive an optional
descending/ascending modifier, but it's not documented.
One thing I noticed in the main logic is that it seems there's no
limit checking when adding/creating new entry. In
hash_trigger_entry_create(), there's a check against max_entries but
if it goes beyond the max, it'd just access a NULL pointer AFAICS. Am
I missing something? Also I don't know what the difference between
->n_entries and ->total_entries (in hash_data).
I guess you wanted to set ->drops in that case, but I cannot find
where it gets set. And I'm not sure it's good to check ->drop first,
since entry can find an existing entry and merged to it even if it
reached the max already.
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists