linux-kernel - Re: [patch] clk: vt8500: several forever loops

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu9R7Y5OKy+P62FAyE2_zf7f=reiLQy-++XziXahbSM15A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:19:19 +0200
From:	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] clk: vt8500: several forever loops

On 2 April 2014 13:04, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> This patch is still needed in linux-next.  It was Acked by Tony Prisk in
> a private email.
>
> Acked-by: Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 07:02:33PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> This does a bunch of looping like this:
>>
>>       for (div2 = 7; div2 >= 0; div2--)
>>
>> But unsigned values are always greater than or equal to zero so it just
>> loops and loops.  Really "mul", "div1" and "div2" should all be declared
>> as int for cleanliness sake.
>>

Apologies if this is a silly question from someone who is utterly
uninformed, but are values == 0 even legal for divisors?
It seems that, at least in some cases, 'div - 1' is or'ed into a
register value (WM8850_BITS_TO_VAL), and I don't think you are
expecting negative values there.
So perhaps instead, change the test to '> 0' ??

Regards,
Ard.

>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> Static checker stuff.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-vt8500.c b/drivers/clk/clk-vt8500.c
>> index 82306f5..8d5b57c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-vt8500.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-vt8500.c
>> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static void vt8500_find_pll_bits(unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate,
>>  static void wm8650_find_pll_bits(unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate,
>>                               u32 *multiplier, u32 *divisor1, u32 *divisor2)
>>  {
>> -     u32 mul, div1, div2;
>> +     int mul, div1, div2;
>>       u32 best_mul, best_div1, best_div2;
>>       unsigned long tclk, rate_err, best_err;
>>
>> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static u32 wm8750_get_filter(u32 parent_rate, u32 divisor1)
>>  static void wm8750_find_pll_bits(unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate,
>>                               u32 *filter, u32 *multiplier, u32 *divisor1, u32 *divisor2)
>>  {
>> -     u32 mul, div1, div2;
>> +     int mul, div1, div2;
>>       u32 best_mul, best_div1, best_div2;
>>       unsigned long tclk, rate_err, best_err;
>>
>> @@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ static void wm8750_find_pll_bits(unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate,
>>  static void wm8850_find_pll_bits(unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate,
>>                               u32 *multiplier, u32 *divisor1, u32 *divisor2)
>>  {
>> -     u32 mul, div1, div2;
>> +     int mul, div1, div2;
>>       u32 best_mul, best_div1, best_div2;
>>       unsigned long tclk, rate_err, best_err;
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives