[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <533C21A2.7030504@citrix.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 15:41:38 +0100
From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
CC: <jonathan.davies@...rix.com>, <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<paul.durrant@...rix.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] xen-netback: Grant copy the
header instead of map and memcpy
On 02/04/14 14:11, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 01/04/14 12:40, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 16:08 +0100, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
>>>
>>> __skb_put(skb, data_len);
>>> + vif->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].source.u.ref = txreq.gref;
>>> + vif->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].source.domid = vif->domid;
>>> + vif->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].source.offset = txreq.offset;
>>> +
>>> + vif->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].dest.u.gmfn =
>>> + virt_to_mfn(skb->data);
>>> + vif->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].dest.domid = DOMID_SELF;
>>> + vif->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].dest.offset =
>>> + offset_in_page(skb->data);
>>> +
>>> + vif->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].len = data_len;
>>> + vif->tx_copy_ops[*copy_ops].flags = GNTCOPY_source_gref;
>>
>> We have gnttab_set_map_op. Should we have gnttap_set_copy_op too?
>
> A set of 3 might be useful I think.
>
> gnttab_set_copy_op_ref_to_gfn()
> gnttab_set_copy_op_gfn_to_ref()
> gnttab_set_copy_op_ref_to_ref()
I doubt it would increase clarity in any way, but I'll send a patch on
top of these.
Zoli
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists