[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xr938urok129.fsf@gthelen.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:49:34 -0700
From: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...e.cz,
glommer@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/2] sl[au]b: charge slabs to kmemcg explicitly
On Tue, Apr 01 2014, Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com> wrote:
> We have only a few places where we actually want to charge kmem so
> instead of intruding into the general page allocation path with
> __GFP_KMEMCG it's better to explictly charge kmem there. All kmem
> charges will be easier to follow that way.
>
> This is a step towards removing __GFP_KMEMCG. It removes __GFP_KMEMCG
> from memcg caches' allocflags. Instead it makes slab allocation path
> call memcg_charge_kmem directly getting memcg to charge from the cache's
> memcg params.
>
> This also eliminates any possibility of misaccounting an allocation
> going from one memcg's cache to another memcg, because now we always
> charge slabs against the memcg the cache belongs to. That's why this
> patch removes the big comment to memcg_kmem_get_cache.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Acked-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists