[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eh1fisfm.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:53:33 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Julien Tinnes <jln@...omium.org>,
Roland McGrath <mcgrathr@...omium.org>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pid_namespace: pidns_get() should check task_active_pid_ns() != NULL
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> writes:
> pidns_get()->get_pid_ns() can hit ns == NULL. This task_struct can't
> go away, but task_active_pid_ns(task) is NULL if release_task(task)
> was already called. Alternatively we could change get_pid_ns(ns) to
> check ns != NULL, but it seems that other callers are fine.
get_pid_ns already has a ns == NULL check, so no code changes should be
needed.
Eric
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
>
> --- x/kernel/pid_namespace.c
> +++ x/kernel/pid_namespace.c
> @@ -318,7 +318,9 @@ static void *pidns_get(struct task_struct *task)
> struct pid_namespace *ns;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> - ns = get_pid_ns(task_active_pid_ns(task));
> + ns = task_active_pid_ns(task);
> + if (ns)
> + get_pid_ns(ns);
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> return ns;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists