[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140402200844.bf9c94540921b7647c75e580@skynet.be>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 20:08:44 +0200
From: Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
"Dave.Kleikamp" <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c: atomically set inode->i_flags
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:47:07 -0400
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 07:29:50PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> > + set_mask_bits(&inode->i_flags, S_IMMUTABLE | S_APPEND | S_NOATIME |
> > + S_DIRSYNC | S_SYNC, new_fl);
>
> Warning --- per discussion with Linus over the weekend, he decided he
> really didn't like the set_mask_bits() interface, because it was too
> prone to abuse. Unfortuantely, Linus had already included an earlier
> version of my patch that used set_mask_bits() in 3.14 without letting
> me know. This is what I have in my ext4 tree for the merge window,
> which is undergoing final testing at the moment. This will cause a
> patch conflict, and it's likely (given Linus's dislike of the
> set_mask_bits interface) that set_mask_bits() will end up getting
> removed from the tree, if not when he fixes up the merge conflict, but
> subsequent to -rc1.
>
> - Ted
>
>
Thanks a lot Ted, I'll wait your inode patch to got mainline before updating this one.
Of course I don't wanna step on your toes if you prefer releasing patches for all FS :)
Fabian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists