[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <533C7485.3030203@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 16:35:17 -0400
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: Marcos Matsunaga <Marcos.Matsunaga@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@...com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/10] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV support
On 04/02/2014 10:32 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 09:27:29AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> N.B. Sorry for the duplicate. This patch series were resent as the
>> original one was rejected by the vger.kernel.org list server
>> due to long header. There is no change in content.
>>
>> v7->v8:
>> - Remove one unneeded atomic operation from the slowpath, thus
>> improving performance.
>> - Simplify some of the codes and add more comments.
>> - Test for X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR CPU feature bit to enable/disable
>> unfair lock.
>> - Reduce unfair lock slowpath lock stealing frequency depending
>> on its distance from the queue head.
>> - Add performance data for IvyBridge-EX CPU.
> FYI, your v7 patch with 32 VCPUs (on a 32 cpu socket machine) on an
> HVM guest under Xen after a while stops working. The workload
> is doing 'make -j32' on the Linux kernel.
>
> Completely unresponsive. Thoughts?
>
Thank for reporting that. I haven't done that much testing on Xen. My
focus was in KVM. I will perform more test on Xen to see if I can
reproduce the problem.
-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists