[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1A7043D5F58CCB44A599DFD55ED4C948452FDABF@FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 21:58:42 +0000
From: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>
To: "Gortmaker, Paul (Wind River)" <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
CC: "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Arne Bockholdt <linux-kernel@...kholdt.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Regression in intel_idle on Avaton/Rangely Mohon Peak board
> [ 0.840668] intel_idle: lapic_timer_reliable_states 0x2
vs.
> [ 0.877528] intel_idle: lapic_timer_reliable_states 0xffffffff
This means CPUID.ARAT is set for the new board, and not set
for the old board. You can observe that also in /proc/cpuinfo flags
where you will likely also find a visible stepping difference between
these two boards.
Bring-up Avoton had ARAT disabled, and also had broken deep C-states.
It looks like that is what your old board has. Throw it away and
use only production steppings. If you are stuck w/ pre-production hardware,
then you need to manually modify upstream Linux to make it happy --
since upstream Linux only cares about production hardware.
thanks,
-Len
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists