[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1396476967.32040.13.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 15:16:07 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Joe Sylve <joe.sylve@...il.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] AArch64: TCR_TG1_64K incorrectly sets TCR_EL1 bits
[31:30]
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 17:10 -0500, Joe Sylve wrote:
> Should it? The reference manual refers to the architecture as AArch64.
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 18:07 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 01:38:44PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 05:00:38AM +0100, Joe Sylve wrote:
> >> > > Section D7.2.83 TCR_EL1, Translation Control Register (EL1) of the
> >> > > latest ARM Architecture Reference Manual, ARMv8, for ARMv8-A states
> >> > > that TCR_EL1 TG1 (bits [31:30]) should be set to 11 for a 64KB
> >> > > TTBR1_EL1 granule size. The mainline 3.14 kernel incorrectly sets
> >> > > those bits to 01 (which is a 16KB granule size).
> >
> > trivia:
> >
> > I think the subject title should be arm64
There was a fair amount of blowback about naming
the arch aarch64 in linux.
So for linux, the directory and arch name is arm64.
from: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/15/133
From Linus Torvalds <>
Date Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:53:21 -0700
- aarch64 is just another druggie name that the ARM people came up
with after drinking too much of the spiked water in cambridge.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists