linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: document the berlin enable-method property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <533D21AF.2070508@free-electrons.com>
Date:	Thu, 03 Apr 2014 10:54:07 +0200
From:	Antoine Ténart 
	<antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
CC:	"sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	"alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com" 
	<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Jimmy Xu <zmxu@...vell.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: document the berlin enable-method property

Jisheng,

On 03/04/2014 10:22, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 01:08:15 -0700
> Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt index
>> 333f4aea3029..a9e42a2dbc99 100644 ---
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt +++
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt @@ -185,6 +185,8 @@ nodes
>> to be present and contain the properties described below. "qcom,gcc-msm8660"
>>   			    "qcom,kpss-acc-v1"
>>   			    "qcom,kpss-acc-v2"
>> +			    "marvell,88de31-smp" - cpu-core handling for
>
> why not "marvell,berlin-smp"?

We have SMP on the BG2 and the BG2Q currently. Future boards may not be 
compatible with this method (BG3 ?), I think "marvell,berlin-smp" is too 
generic.

We could use "marvell,88de31xx-smp" as Alexandre suggested.

Antoine

-- 
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/