[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140403093230.GB7225@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 11:32:30 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix command parser debug print
format mismatches
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 08:26:23AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 04/02/2014 01:24 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > Drop the cast from the pointer diff to fix:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c:405:4: warning: format '%td' expects
> > argument of type 'ptrdiff_t', but argument 5 has type 'long unsigned int'
> > [-Wformat]
> >
> > While at it, use %u for u32.
> >
> > Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Randy, try as I might, I wasn't able to coerce gcc to spit out that
> > warning. Please enlighten me! (Does this fix the warn?)
>
> Yes, it does. Thanks.
>
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Maybe I'm blind, but I think the recent refactoring patch fixed this. Can
someone please double-check? I always get confused with printf formats ;-)
Thanks, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists