[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140403104308.GP13491@8bytes.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 12:43:08 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] cmdline: Hide "debug" from /proc/cmdline
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 06:47:57PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Whether it actually fixes the problem that Borislav had is
> questionable, of course. For all I know, systemd debug mode generates
> so much data in *other* ways and then causes feedback loops with the
> kernel debugging that this patch is totally immaterial, and dmesg was
> never the main issue. But unlike the "hide 'debug' from
> /proc/cmdline", I think this patch at least _conceptually_ makes a lot
> of sense, even if systemd gets fixed, so ...
How about just ignoring writes to /dev/kmsg altogether by default
(unless explicitly enabled in Kconfig or on the kernel cmdline)? Maybe I
am missing something but what are the legitimate use-cases for generally
allowing user-space to write into the kernel-log?
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists