linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH regression] net: phy: fix initialization (config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 03 Apr 2014 17:58:16 +0200
From:	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH regression] net: phy: fix initialization (config_init)
 for Marvel 88E1116R PHYs

Am 03.04.2014 17:45, schrieb Sebastian Hesselbarth:

>
> I will try to reproduce it and if I hit it, will do a bisect to find
> (and fix) the offending patch.
>
>> I have better ways to waste my time.
>
> Like writing workarounds instead of fixing bugs?

Sure. If I would try to fix (or even describe) every bug in the kernel I 
already know about, I would never have time to do anything else.

Besides that you still try to ignore, that I didn't know at first that 
it's a workaround at all. Especially after I've discovered that the 
reset is the place where things are failing. Otherwise I wouldn't have 
sent the patch (which I know NOW that it just is a workaround).

Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/