linux-kernel - Initramfs FSID altered in 3.14

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140403175744.GE585@rampage>
Date:	Thu, 3 Apr 2014 13:57:44 -0400
From:	Dave Reisner <d@...conindy.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	tj@...nel.org
Subject: Initramfs FSID altered in 3.14

Hi,

[This is a repost of a G+ post at Tejun's request]

With Linux 3.14, you might notice in /proc/self/mountinfo that your
root's parent FSID is now 0, instead of the 1 that it's been for the
last N years. Tejun wrote the change (9e30cc9595303b27b48) that caused
this, but the change comes in a rather innocuous way. Instead of an
internal kernel mount of sysfs being assigned 0, it's now the initramfs.

So far, this has already caused switch_root and findmnt (from
util-linux) to break, cp (from coreutils) to break when using the -x
flag in early userspace, and it's also been pointed out that systemd's
readahead code makes assumptions about a device number of 0.

Are we now supposed to go and change all the assumptions in userspace
about 0 being special? I'm conflicted. The kernel isn't supposed to
break userspace, but it seems to me that FSIDs were never something to
rely on -- similar to the block device numbering scheme.

Cheers,
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/