[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFw+jFdmmi6eZ6+RpLM9heyowfXsZxb6Y91GNkPU677PmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 13:02:45 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] cgroup changes for v3.15-rc1
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Ah, I remembered the other way around. We could leak cgroup_root
> reference, not the other way around. cgroup_mount() can be called
> multiple times for the same sb and we inc cgroup_root's ref each time
> but cgroup_kill_sb() only happens when the sb is released, so if we do
> the following,
Oh, Christ, I see what you are talking about.
That interface is all kinds of crazy.
> The cgroup_root should be destroyed but it isn't, I think. We'd need
> to bump cgroup_root's refcnt only when a new sb is created. It's
> kinda ugly. Hmmm...
Ok, so I guess we can use that "new_sb_created" thing, and I'll redo
my merge resolution to reflect that. I do find this incredibly ugly.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists