linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] blk-mq: support for shared tags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <533CDF24.9030902@bjorling.me>
Date:	Wed, 02 Apr 2014 21:10:12 -0700
From:	Matias Bjorling <m@...rling.me>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] blk-mq: support for shared tags

On 04/02/2014 12:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:16:21PM -0700, Matias Bjorling wrote:
>> Hi Christoph,
>>
>> Can you rebase it on top of 3.14. I have trouble applying it for testing.
> 
> Hi Martin,
> 
> the series is based on top of Jens' for-next branch.  I've also pushed out a
> git tree to the blk-mq-share-tags.2 branch of
> 
> 	git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi.git
> 
> to make testing and reviewing easier.
>

Thanks.

Regarding the tags API. I think the best approach is a struct
blk_mq_tags_reg. That'll make their parameters very visible in the
drivers. I'll send a patch with the change, using the nvme driver as an
example.

>> For nvme, there's need for two separate types of queues. The admin queue
>> (before initializing blk-mq) and the actual hardware queues.
>>
>> Should we allow the driver to get/put tags before initializing blk-mq?
>> Or let drivers implement their own framework?
> 
> What do you mean with initializing blk-mq?  We need to allocate data
> structures for sure, and I don't see much else in terms of initialization
> in blk-mq.
> 

For the nvme driver, there's a single admin queue, which is outside
blk-mq's control, and the X normal queues. Should we allow the shared
tags structure to be used (get/put) for the admin queue, without
initializing blk-mq? or should the drivers simply implement their own
tags for their admin queue?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/