[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 09:21:16 +0800
From: Jovi Zhangwei <jovi.zhangwei@...il.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: ktap and ebpf integration
Hi Alexei,
We talked a lot on ktap and ebpf integration in these days,
Now I think we can put into deeply to thinking out some
technical issues in there.
Firstly, I want to make sure you are support this ktap and
ebpf integration direction, I aware you have ongoing 'bpf filter'
patch set work, which actually overlapping with ktap integration
efforts (IMO the interface should be unified and simple for user,
so I think filter debugfs file is not a good interface), so please let
me know your answer about this.
If the answer is yes, then we can go through ebpf core
improvement, for example:
- support global variable access
this is mandatory for dynamic tracing, otherwise, there have
no possible to run a simple script like get function execution
time.
- support timer in kernel
The final solution must need to support kernel timer for profiling,
and sampling stack.
- support register multi-event in one script
- support trace_end
If the answer of first question is no, you still believe your "bpf filter"
solution is a correct way, that's means there have no need to
integrate ktap and ebpf, and don't need any ktap upstream efforts,
I 'm fine with it, then I can make another technical plan for ktap.
Thank you.
Jovi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists