[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 12:06:09 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
linaro-networking@...aro.org, Arvind.Chauhan@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH V2 26/36] hrtimer: take lock only once for a cpu_base in hrtimer_run_queues()
We are taking cpu_base->lock for every clock-base in hrtimer_run_queues() and
there is nothing in there which prevents us to take this lock only once. Modify
code to take lock only once for a cpu_base.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
kernel/hrtimer.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c
index 2d9a7e2..c712960 100644
--- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
@@ -1466,8 +1466,8 @@ void hrtimer_run_queues(void)
if (cpu_base->active_bases)
hrtimer_get_softirq_time(cpu_base);
+ raw_spin_lock(&cpu_base->lock);
for_each_active_base(index, base, cpu_base, active_bases) {
- raw_spin_lock(&cpu_base->lock);
while ((node = timerqueue_getnext(&base->active))) {
struct hrtimer *timer;
@@ -1478,8 +1478,8 @@ void hrtimer_run_queues(void)
__run_hrtimer(timer, &base->softirq_time);
}
- raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_base->lock);
}
+ raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_base->lock);
}
/*
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists