linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] x86: reboot doesn't reboot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 4 Apr 2014 16:36:34 +0100
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [BUG] x86: reboot doesn't reboot

On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 08:13:48AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/04/2014 08:12 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 09:27:48AM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> > 
> >> The current situation is,
> >> - we have one(do we know more?) preproduction machine hangs by CF9.
> >> - We have more than one(could be thousand known) production machine
> >> works by CF9.
> > 
> > Production hardware should never require CF9.
> > 
> 
> There are a lot of things that shouldn't be.

Windows doesn't hit CF9, and production hardware is always tested with 
Windows, so. Adding CF9 may make things work in some situations but it 
clearly breaks them in others - we'd be better off spending our time 
figuring out why systems that appear to need CF9 won't otherwise work.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/