[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 12:12:26 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>,
Adam Williamson <awilliam@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/reboot] [PATCH] x86: Try the BIOS reboot method before
the PCI reboot method
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> 'Breaks a box' is more than enough justification to revert a patch...
Indeed. That's especially true when "breaks a box" was found within a
day of the patch being merged.
The default thinking should be: "If we found _one_ box that broke
during the merge window, that probably means that there are at least
ten thousand boxes that would break if the change actually hit a major
distribution kernel".
Yes, developer boxes are sometimes "special". But the fact is, I doubt
that's the case. Not when this kind of breakage (oops, reboot doesn't
work) is actually not all that unusual. The quirk entries we have for
it are *not* developer boxes.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists