[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b39369f5f574577ae386256dd2d4c03@BY2PR03MB299.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 22:53:53 +0000
From: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] x86/platform/hyperv: When on Hyper-v use NULL
legacy PIC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vivek Goyal [mailto:vgoyal@...hat.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2014 1:32 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: x86@...nel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; olaf@...fle.de;
> apw@...onical.com; jasowang@...hat.com; hpa@...or.com;
> stable@...r.kernel.org; Dave Young
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/platform/hyperv: When on Hyper-v use NULL
> legacy PIC
>
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 08:09:47PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Vivek Goyal [mailto:vgoyal@...hat.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, April 4, 2014 8:16 AM
> > > To: KY Srinivasan
> > > Cc: x86@...nel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; olaf@...fle.de;
> > > apw@...onical.com; jasowang@...hat.com; hpa@...or.com;
> > > stable@...r.kernel.org; Dave Young
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/platform/hyperv: When on Hyper-v use
> > > NULL legacy PIC
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:01:51PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > >
> > > [..]
> > > > The problem we were having is that the initial boot on the EFI
> > > > firmware would succeed as the legacy PIC would be NULL legacy PIC,
> > > > however in the kexeced kernel, the initial boot information is not
> > > > available and so we would not set the legacy PIC to NULL legacy PIC.
> > >
> > > I am curious to know what "initial boot information" is not
> > > available in kexeced kernel and who is supposed to provide that.
> > >
> > > Is it a bug or that's how it is supposed to work.
> >
> > As the name indicates, the dump kernel is not "booted" but it is kexeced.
> > In the address space of this second kernel, the initial boot state is not
> visible.
>
> What do you mean by "initial boot state"? Most of the state we pass to
> second kernel in bootparams and on command line and rest second kernel
> can query from firmware as needed.
Specifically, this check I had:
if (efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT)) {
}
Fails in the kexeced kernel even when running on EFI firmware.
K. Y
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists