[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140405001953.GE15806@google.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 18:19:53 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
Cc: linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] pci: Introduce pci_register_io_range() helper
function.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:27PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> Some architectures do not share x86 simple view of the PCI I/O space
> and instead use a range of addresses that map to bus addresses. For
> some architectures these ranges will be expressed by OF bindings
> in a device tree file.
It's true that the current Linux "x86 view of PCI I/O space" is pretty
simple and limited. But I don't think that's a fundamental x86 limitation
(other than the fact that the actual INB/OUTB/etc. CPU instructions
themselves are limited to a single 64K I/O port space).
Host bridges on x86 could have MMIO apertures that turn CPU memory accesses
into PCI port accesses. We could implement any number of I/O port spaces
this way, by making the kernel inb()/outb()/etc. interfaces smart enough to
use the memory-mapped space instead of (or in addition to) the
INB/OUTB/etc. instructions.
ia64 does this (see arch/ia64/include/asm/io.h for a little description)
and I think maybe one or two other arches have something similar.
> Introduce a pci_register_io_range() helper function that can be used
> by the architecture code to keep track of the I/O ranges described by the
> PCI bindings. If the PCI_IOBASE macro is not defined that signals
> lack of support for PCI and we return an error.
I don't quite see how you intend to use this, because this series doesn't
include any non-stub implementation of pci_register_io_range().
Is this anything like the ia64 strategy I mentioned above? If so, it would
be really nice to unify some of this stuff.
> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
> Tested-by: Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>
> ---
> drivers/of/address.c | 9 +++++++++
> include/linux/of_address.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c
> index 1a54f1f..be958ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/address.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/address.c
> @@ -619,6 +619,15 @@ const __be32 *of_get_address(struct device_node *dev, int index, u64 *size,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_get_address);
>
> +int __weak pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t addr, resource_size_t size)
> +{
> +#ifndef PCI_IOBASE
> + return -EINVAL;
> +#else
> + return 0;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> unsigned long __weak pci_address_to_pio(phys_addr_t address)
> {
> if (address > IO_SPACE_LIMIT)
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_address.h b/include/linux/of_address.h
> index 5f6ed6b..40c418d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_address.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_address.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ extern void __iomem *of_iomap(struct device_node *device, int index);
> extern const __be32 *of_get_address(struct device_node *dev, int index,
> u64 *size, unsigned int *flags);
>
> +extern int pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t addr, resource_size_t size);
> extern unsigned long pci_address_to_pio(phys_addr_t addr);
>
> extern int of_pci_range_parser_init(struct of_pci_range_parser *parser,
> --
> 1.9.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists