lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 5 Apr 2014 17:32:28 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] queue_timer_on_next_cpu() should be static

On 5 April 2014 13:39, Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com> wrote:
> the new introduced function queue_timer_on_next_cpu() should be defined as static
>
> Signed-off-by: Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com>
> ---
>  kernel/time/clocksource.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> index 9e96853..1c00e10 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ void clocksource_mark_unstable(struct clocksource *cs)
>         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&watchdog_lock, flags);
>  }
>
> -void queue_timer_on_next_cpu(void)
> +static void queue_timer_on_next_cpu(void)
>  {
>         /*
>          * Cycle through CPUs to check if the CPUs stay synchronized to each

Thanks, will merge this into my patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists