linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 4/5] s390: Mark bits in allocated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1396762766-4942-5-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Date:	Sat,  5 Apr 2014 22:39:25 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, linux390@...ibm.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 4/5] s390: Mark bits in allocated_irqs in general code

Second irq_reserve_irqs calling is from arch s390, and
s390 does not use SPARSE_IRQ yet.

We could set bits for legacy bits early in !SPARSE_IRQ version
early_irq_init() directly instead of calling irq_reserve_irqs later.

Adding weak version arch_proble_early_allocate_nr_irqs() for
!SPARESE_IRQ, and let s390 to have specific version to
pass correct irq number that need to be marked in allocated_irqs.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux390@...ibm.com
---
 arch/s390/kernel/irq.c |  6 +++++-
 include/linux/irq.h    |  1 +
 kernel/irq/irqdesc.c   | 10 ++++++++++
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c b/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
index d42b14c..2838928 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
@@ -90,9 +90,13 @@ static const struct irq_class irqclass_sub_desc[NR_ARCH_IRQS] = {
 	[CPU_RST]    = {.name = "RST", .desc = "[CPU] CPU Restart"},
 };
 
+int arch_probe_early_allocate_nr_irqs(void)
+{
+	return THIN_INTERRUPT;
+}
+
 void __init init_IRQ(void)
 {
-	irq_reserve_irqs(0, THIN_INTERRUPT);
 	init_cio_interrupts();
 	init_airq_interrupts();
 	init_ext_interrupts();
diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
index d278838..7588ee9 100644
--- a/include/linux/irq.h
+++ b/include/linux/irq.h
@@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ int __irq_alloc_descs(int irq, unsigned int from, unsigned int cnt, int node,
 
 void irq_free_descs(unsigned int irq, unsigned int cnt);
 int irq_reserve_irqs(unsigned int from, unsigned int cnt);
+int arch_probe_early_allocate_nr_irqs(void);
 
 static inline void irq_free_desc(unsigned int irq)
 {
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
index a7174617..dfb971c 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
@@ -248,10 +248,16 @@ struct irq_desc irq_desc[NR_IRQS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp = {
 	}
 };
 
+int __weak arch_probe_early_allocate_nr_irqs(void)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 int __init early_irq_init(void)
 {
 	int count, i, node = first_online_node;
 	struct irq_desc *desc;
+	int nr = arch_probe_early_allocate_nr_irqs();
 
 	init_irq_default_affinity();
 
@@ -267,6 +273,10 @@ int __init early_irq_init(void)
 		lockdep_set_class(&desc[i].lock, &irq_desc_lock_class);
 		desc_set_defaults(i, &desc[i], node, NULL);
 	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
+		set_bit(i, allocated_irqs);
+
 	return arch_early_irq_init();
 }
 
-- 
1.8.4.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/