lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1396773020.11763.17.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date:	Sun, 06 Apr 2014 10:30:20 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, fweisbec@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	mingo@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org, lizefan@...wei.com,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linaro-networking@...aro.org,
	Arvind.Chauhan@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/8] cpusets: Isolate CPUs via sysfs using cpusets

On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 14:05 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: 
> We need to migrate away all the background kernel activities (Unbound) for
> systems requiring isolation of cores (HPC, Real time, networking, etc). After
> creating cpusets, you can write 1 or 0 to cpuset.quiesce file.

I wonder if adding a quiesce switch is really necessary.

Seems to me that if you don't have load balancing turned off, you can't
be very concerned about perturbation, so this should be tied into the
load balancing on/off switch as an extension to isolating cores from the
#1 perturbation source, the scheduler.

I also didn't notice a check for is_cpu_exclusive() at a glance, which
would be a bug, but one that would go away if this additional isolation
were coupled to the existing isolation switch.

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ