[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140406034750.GA7674@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 20:47:50 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: rb tree hrtimer lockup bug (found by perf_fuzzer)
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 01:18:34PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2014, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Ok. So we know now what we are looking for.
> > >
> > > [ 1.579996] Serial: 8250/16550 driver, 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled
> > > ΓΏ[ 1.607279] 00:09: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4, base_baud = 115200) is a 16550A
> > > [ 1.615032] kobject: 'ttyS1' (ffff88011772ac10): kobject_release, parent (null) (delayed 250)
> > > [ 1.624534] kobject: '(null)' (ffff8801177400f0): kobject_release, parent (null) (delayed 500)
> > > [ 1.654213] 0000:00:16.3: ttyS1 at I/O 0xf0e0 (irq = 19, base_baud = 115200) is a 16550A
> > >
> > > [ 3.294047] Invalid timer base: tmr ffff880117740150 tmr->base (null) base ffff880118898000
> > >
> > > 1634110us : obj: ffff880117740130 initialized kobject_delayed_cleanup+0x0/0x90
> > >
> > > So that happens in the context of the 8250 serial driver.
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Below is a patch which gives us the call path of the unnamed object
> > > which causes the crash.
> >
> > I've attached the boot log with that patch applied.
>
> Vince, can you please disable CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE and remove
> all the debug patches to see whether the issue goes away?
>
> I had a deeper look down that code path and the issue is, that the
> serial core is not compatible with the deferred kobject release.
>
> The tty_io layer uses a kobject embedded in its internal tty device
> representation and reuses that.
It does? What kobject is that? I've dug through the code and I can't
find it. I see where we create a new device in
tty_register_device_attr() which is dynamic and should be torn down when
free_tty_struct() is called eventually.
> So it seems that for whatever reason the tty layer releases ttyS1 and
> then initializes it again. So the deferred release will queue the
> object for release while the tty layer happily reinitializes it.
That's not good, but I can't find that code path, any hints?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists