[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140407111639.GB26985@ulmo>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:16:40 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com>,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] backlight: pwm_bl: set pwm polarity when using
platform data
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 02:03:21PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Set inversed polarity when .pwm_active_low is set in the platform_data. With
> device tree, this is taken care of by of_pwm_xlate_with_flags(), called from
> of_pwm_get().
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 8 ++++++++
> include/linux/pwm_backlight.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> index b75201ff46f6..ffdd3b2b2742 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> @@ -309,6 +309,14 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (data->pwm_period_ns > 0)
> pwm_set_period(pb->pwm, data->pwm_period_ns);
>
> + /*
> + * The DT case is taking care of polarity in of_pwm_get(). For the
> + * non-DT case, set the polarity from platform data.
> + */
> + if (data->pwm_active_low)
> + if (pwm_set_polarity(pb->pwm, PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED))
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "impossible to invert polarity\n");
Could this perhaps be solved by adding a field to the PWM lookup table
that's used for non-DT cases? The idea being that we can use the same
interfaces for DT and non-DT cases, so we should try to move both
towards the same representation.
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists