[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B1AFB7151@HASMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:10:40 +0000
From: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To: Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz>
CC: "Greg KH (gregkh@...uxfoundation.org)" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: 3.0 -> 3.10 regression? poweroff instead of reboot?
>
> Hello Tomas,
> > I would need the devices ids of the MEI device on your platform (lspci will do
> the job), is this same platform as you tested before?
> > You should not get to requesting the HW readiness w/ my patch.
>
> yes, it's the same box.
>
> here are the IDs:
>
> 00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series
> Chipset Family MEI Controller #1 (rev 04)
> 00:16.1 Communication controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series
> Chipset Family MEI Controller #2 (rev 04)
>
> 00:16.0 0780: 8086:1c3a (rev 04)
> 00:16.1 0780: 8086:1c3b (rev 04)
Are use you have the patch applied, because the driver just should not load.
If any case you dump the firmware status registers"
At offset 0x40 and 0x48 in PCI config space
sudo hexdump -s 0x48 -n 4 /proc/bus/pci/00/16.0
sudo hexdump -s 0x40 -n 4 /proc/bus/pci/00/16.0
Thanks
Tomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists