linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative conditional "short" jmp's

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140407142723.GA8881@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 7 Apr 2014 16:27:23 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <aarapov@...hat.com>,
	David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
	Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@...hat.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative conditional
	"short" jmp's

On 04/06, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Incomplete, lacks "jcxz". Simple to fix. Anything else?

Please see v2 below. Simplify the preprocessor hacks.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative conditional "short" jmp's

Incomplete, lacks "jcxz". Simple to fix. Anything else?

Reported-by: Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c |   61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index 9283024..3865d8b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -466,18 +466,72 @@ static bool ttt_is_call(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe)
 	return auprobe->ttt.opc1 == 0xe8;
 }
 
+#define CASE_COND					\
+	COND(70, 71, XF(OF))				\
+	COND(72, 73, XF(CF))				\
+	COND(74, 75, XF(ZF))				\
+	COND(78, 79, XF(SF))				\
+	COND(7a, 7b, XF(PF))				\
+	COND(76, 77, XF(CF) || XF(ZF))			\
+	COND(7c, 7d, XF(SF) != XF(OF))			\
+	COND(7e, 7f, XF(ZF) || XF(SF) != XF(OF))
+
+#define COND(op_y, op_n, expr)				\
+	case 0x ## op_y: DO((expr) != 0)		\
+	case 0x ## op_n: DO((expr) == 0)
+
+#define XF(xf)	(!!(flags & X86_EFLAGS_ ## xf))
+
+static bool is_cond_jmp_opcode(u8 opcode)
+{
+	switch (opcode) {
+	#define DO(expr)	\
+		return true;
+	CASE_COND
+	#undef	DO
+
+	default:
+		return false;
+	}
+}
+
+static bool check_jmp_cond(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	unsigned long flags = regs->flags;
+
+	switch (auprobe->ttt.opc1) {
+	case 0x00:	/* not a conditional jmp */
+		return true;
+
+	#define DO(expr)	\
+		return expr;
+	CASE_COND
+	#undef	DO
+
+	default:
+		BUG();
+	}
+}
+
+#undef	XF
+#undef	COND
+#undef	CASE_COND
+
 static bool ttt_emulate_op(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	unsigned long new_ip = regs->ip += auprobe->ttt.ilen;
+	unsigned long disp = auprobe->ttt.disp;
 
 	if (ttt_is_call(auprobe)) {
 		unsigned long new_sp = regs->sp - sizeof_long();
 		if (copy_to_user((void __user *)new_sp, &new_ip, sizeof_long()))
 			return false;
 		regs->sp = new_sp;
+	} else if (!check_jmp_cond(auprobe, regs)) {
+		disp = 0;
 	}
 
-	regs->ip = new_ip + auprobe->ttt.disp;
+	regs->ip = new_ip + disp;
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -536,8 +590,11 @@ static int ttt_setup_xol_ops(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
 		ttt_clear_displacement(auprobe, insn);
 		auprobe->ttt.opc1 = opc1;
 		break;
+
 	default:
-		return -ENOSYS;
+		if (!is_cond_jmp_opcode(opc1))
+			return -ENOSYS;
+		auprobe->ttt.opc1 = opc1;
 	}
 
 	auprobe->ttt.ilen = insn->length;
-- 
1.5.5.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/