linux-kernel - Re: Bisected KVM hang on x86-32 between v3.12 and v3.13

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140407150705.GB13658@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Mon, 7 Apr 2014 17:07:05 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Michele Ballabio <barra_cuda@...amail.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, toralf.foerster@....de,
	fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...nel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: Bisected KVM hang on x86-32 between v3.12 and v3.13

On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 05:03:37PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> So what I suspect at this point is that because i386 and x86_64 have a
> difference in current_thread_info() (i386 is stack based), we end up
> setting the TIF_NEED_RESCHED bit on the wrong stack.
> 
> Now I have some vague memories of propagating the TIF flags on stack
> switch, but I cannot remember what arch we did that for. Let me stare at
> this a little more.
> 
> Also, IFF this is the case, then the fingered patch above (and your
> suggested 'fix') aren't the real curlpit/cure but simply make it
> more/less likely to happen.
> 
> Now, Steve had a patch somewhere that would make i386 use per-cpu
> variables for current_thread_info() just like x86_64 already does I
> think. Let me go find them too.

Ohh, goodie, they're already in Linus' tree. Could you see if current
git still suffers this problem?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/