[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1396898056.8206.32.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 20:14:16 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Raphael Geissert <geissert@...ian.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@...rsoft.ru>, 741958@...s.debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 17/18] cifs: ensure that uncached writes handle
unmapped areas correctly
On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 15:45 +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7 April 2014 03:41, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 00:35 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >> 3.2.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > [...]
> > --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> [...]
> > + /*
> > + * i + 1 now represents the number of pages we actually used in
> > + * the copy phase above.
> > + */
> > + npages = min(npages, i + 1);
>
> I'm having trouble understanding why min() is needed here. It
> shouldn't harm either, but I find it confusing.
Because in the case where no error occurred, the comment is not true:
i == npages and npages have been used. The loop used upstream works,
but it seemed a bit silly to use a loop here.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Sturgeon's Law: Ninety percent of everything is crap.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists