linux-kernel - RE: 3.0 -> 3.10 regression? poweroff instead of reboot?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Apr 2014 19:01:25 +0000
From:	"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To:	Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz>
CC:	"Greg KH (gregkh@...uxfoundation.org)" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: 3.0 -> 3.10 regression? poweroff instead of reboot?



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikola Ciprich [mailto:nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz]
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 16:26
> To: Winkler, Tomas
> Cc: Greg KH (gregkh@...uxfoundation.org); linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Nikola
> Ciprich
> Subject: Re: 3.0 -> 3.10 regression? poweroff instead of reboot?
> 
> Hi Tomas,
> 
> yes, I just checked source rpm and it's applied..
> 
> here are the dumps:
> 
> [root@...0test ~]# hexdump -s 0x48 -n 4 /proc/bus/pci/00/16.0
> 0000048 a301 3900
> 000004c
> [root@...0test ~]# hexdump -s 0x40 -n 4 /proc/bus/pci/00/16.0
> 0000040 0345 000f
> 0000044

I'm not sure how this is possible that this is failing for you

if ((0xa301 & 0x600) == 0x200)
	goto no_mei; 
so this is okay, the driver should not bind

How the patch worked for you before this test?  

Sorry for asking but can you please double check your compilation setup. 
 
Thanks
Tomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/