[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140408075107.f13e69a4d08471656acfb9f3@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 07:51:07 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 11:26:54 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:52:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c: In function 'ocfs2_block_group_set_bits':
> > fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:1357:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_ocfs2_block_group_set_bits' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > trace_ocfs2_block_group_set_bits(bit_off, num_bits);
> > ^
> >
> > I have no idea how to track this down :-( The only patches affecting this
> > code are now in Linus' tree. I can only assume that some implicitly
> > included header file is no longer included. I have just left it broken
> > for now.
>
> I can't reproduce this with either mainline or linux-next. Pulled half
> an hour ago, powerpc allyesconfig.
Rats! I think I have been fooled by my own scripts. What was built here
was the result of me trying to merge your tree. After abandoning the
attempt, my build tree did not get reset to the final linux-next before I
did my final build checks which include the powerpc allyesconfig.
Sorry about that.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists