[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140407081644.GD11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 10:16:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mgorman@...e.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Move task_numa_free() to
__put_task_struct()
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:30:30AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> - double_lock(&my_grp->lock, &grp->lock);
> + BUG_ON(irqs_disabled());
> + double_lock_irq(&my_grp->lock, &grp->lock);
So either make this:
local_irq_disable();
double_lock();
or
>
> for (i = 0; i < NR_NUMA_HINT_FAULT_STATS * nr_node_ids; i++) {
> my_grp->faults[i] -= p->numa_faults_memory[i];
> @@ -1692,6 +1693,7 @@ static void task_numa_group(struct task_
>
> spin_unlock(&my_grp->lock);
> spin_unlock(&grp->lock);
> + local_irq_enable();
use:
spin_unlock()
spin_unlock_irq()
or so, but this imbalance is making my itch :-)
>
> rcu_assign_pointer(p->numa_group, grp);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists