[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5343A494.9070707@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 09:26:12 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@...il.com>,
Josh Berkus <josh@...iodbs.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@...quadrant.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Disable zone_reclaim_mode by default
On 04/08/2014 12:34 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> When it was introduced, zone_reclaim_mode made sense as NUMA distances
> punished and workloads were generally partitioned to fit into a NUMA
> node. NUMA machines are now common but few of the workloads are NUMA-aware
> and it's routine to see major performance due to zone_reclaim_mode being
> disabled but relatively few can identify the problem.
^ I think you meant "enabled" here?
Just in case the cover letter goes to the changelog...
Vlastimil
> Those that require zone_reclaim_mode are likely to be able to detect when
> it needs to be enabled and tune appropriately so lets have a sensible
> default for the bulk of users.
>
> Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt | 17 +++++++++--------
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 1 -
> mm/page_alloc.c | 17 +----------------
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists