[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1396953211.25633.16.camel@linux-fkkt.site>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 12:33:31 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
To: Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>
Cc: Xiao Jin <jin.xiao@...el.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com, yanmin.zhang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cdc-acm: some enhancement on acm delayed write
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 09:33 +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:05:20AM +0800, Xiao Jin wrote:
> > (2) acm tty port ASYNCB_INITIALIZED flag will be cleared when
> > close. If acm resume callback run after ASYNCB_INITIALIZED flag
> > cleared, there will have no chance for delayed write to start.
> > That lead to acm_wb.use can't be cleared. If user space open
> > acm tty again and try to setd, tty will be blocked in
> > tty_wait_until_sent for ever.
> >
> > This patch have two modification.
> > (1) use list_head to save the write acm_wb during acm suspend.
> > It can ensure no acm write abandoned.
> > (2) enable flush buffer callback when acm tty close. acm delayed
> > wb will start before acm port shutdown callback, it make sure
> > the delayed acm_wb.use to be cleared. The patch also clear
> > acm_wb.use and acm.transmitting when port shutdown.
>
> This is not the right way to do this. See below.
If I see this correctly, then ASYNCB_INITIALIZED is cleared in
tty_port_close() we is called from acm_tty_close(). Thus it should
be enough to make sure that the device is resumed at the beginning
of acm_tty_close() and acm_resume() will do the job automatically.
What do you think?
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists