[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1396964322.25633.21.camel@linux-fkkt.site>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 15:38:42 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
To: Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>
Cc: Xiao Jin <jin.xiao@...el.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com, yanmin.zhang@...el.com,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cdc-acm: some enhancement on acm delayed write
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 15:17 +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> [ +CC: Alan ]
>
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 12:33:31PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 09:33 +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:05:20AM +0800, Xiao Jin wrote:
> >
> > > > (2) acm tty port ASYNCB_INITIALIZED flag will be cleared when
> > > > close. If acm resume callback run after ASYNCB_INITIALIZED flag
> > > > cleared, there will have no chance for delayed write to start.
> > > > That lead to acm_wb.use can't be cleared. If user space open
> > > > acm tty again and try to setd, tty will be blocked in
> > > > tty_wait_until_sent for ever.
> > > >
> > > > This patch have two modification.
> > > > (1) use list_head to save the write acm_wb during acm suspend.
> > > > It can ensure no acm write abandoned.
> > > > (2) enable flush buffer callback when acm tty close. acm delayed
> > > > wb will start before acm port shutdown callback, it make sure
> > > > the delayed acm_wb.use to be cleared. The patch also clear
> > > > acm_wb.use and acm.transmitting when port shutdown.
> > >
> > > This is not the right way to do this. See below.
> >
> > If I see this correctly, then ASYNCB_INITIALIZED is cleared in
> > tty_port_close() we is called from acm_tty_close(). Thus it should
> > be enough to make sure that the device is resumed at the beginning
> > of acm_tty_close() and acm_resume() will do the job automatically.
> > What do you think?
>
> But the device should already be about to be resumed, right? If the port
Yes.
> is closed fast enough that resume hasn't had time to run before
> shutdown is called I think the right thing to do is simply to discard
> the delayed bytes (in shutdown).
I think if we said we have transmitted then we should do so.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists