| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:26:18 -0500 From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org> To: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: MSM8974: Add pinctrl node On 04/08/2014 09:18 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: > > Back in July, Qualcomm submitted a patch that added this information > into the device tree: > > http://marc.info/?t=137185166100003&r=1&w=2 > > However, this was rejected. Now it appears that this information is > again being added to the device tree, but it's being accepted. What's > different now? After re-reading the documentation and having someone kindly explain this to me, I understand it now. The device tree is only specifying specific configurations that a driver wants, not the sum total of all possible groupings. -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists