lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1396973570-13995-1-git-send-email-grmoore@altera.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 Apr 2014 11:12:49 -0500
From:	<grmoore@...era.com>
To:	<ggrahammoore@...il.com>
CC:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>,
	Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@...com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
	Insop Song <insop.song@...nspeed.com>,
	Graham Moore <grmoore@...era.com>,
	<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alan Tull <atull@...era.com>,
	Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...era.com>,
	Yves Vandervennet <rocket.yvanderv@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Add support for flag status register on Micron chips   

From: Graham Moore <grmoore@...era.com>

This is a slightly different version of the patch that Insop Song
submitted (http://marc.info/?i=201403012022.10111.marex%20()%20denx%20!%20de).

I talked to Insop, and he agreed I should submit this patch as a follow-on to his.

This patch uses a flag in the m25p_ids[] array to determine which chips need
to use the FSR (Flag Status Register).

Rationale for using the FSR:

The Micron data sheets say we have to do this, at least for the multi-die 512M 
and 1G parts (n25q512 and n25q00).  In practice, if we don't check the FSR 
for program/erase status, and we rely solely on the status register (SR), 
then we get corrupted data in the flash.

Micron told us (Altera) that for multi-die chips based on the 65nm 256MB
die, we need to check the SR first, then check the FSR, which is why the 
wait_for_fsr_ready function does that.  Future chips based on 45 nm 512MB die 
will use the FSR only.              

Thanks.

Graham Moore (1):
  Add support for flag status register on Micron chips.

 drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c |   94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ