[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1396976162.4613.15.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 18:56:02 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: update_rq_clock() must skip ONE update
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:53 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> OK; so as previously mentioned (Oct '13); I've entirely had it with
> skip_clock_update bugs, so I got angry and did the below.
Goody, kick butt take names ;-)
> Its not something I can merge, not least because it uses trace_printk(),
> but it should be usable to 1) demonstate the above actually helps and 2)
> make damn sure we got it right this time :-)
That would be nice, little cycle savers like this aren't supposed to
have nasty corner cases that can clean your clock (pun intended).
> I've not really stared at the output much yet; but when you select
> function_graph tracer; we get lovely things like:
I'll plug it into my quilt pile.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists