[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53443018.2090408@citrix.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 18:21:28 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
CC: Linux-X86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Noonan <steven@...inklabs.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] mm: use paravirt friendly ops for NUMA hinting ptes
On 08/04/14 14:09, Mel Gorman wrote:
> David Vrabel identified a regression when using automatic NUMA balancing
> under Xen whereby page table entries were getting corrupted due to the
> use of native PTE operations. Quoting him
>
> Xen PV guest page tables require that their entries use machine
> addresses if the preset bit (_PAGE_PRESENT) is set, and (for
> successful migration) non-present PTEs must use pseudo-physical
> addresses. This is because on migration MFNs in present PTEs are
> translated to PFNs (canonicalised) so they may be translated back
> to the new MFN in the destination domain (uncanonicalised).
>
> pte_mknonnuma(), pmd_mknonnuma(), pte_mknuma() and pmd_mknuma()
> set and clear the _PAGE_PRESENT bit using pte_set_flags(),
> pte_clear_flags(), etc.
>
> In a Xen PV guest, these functions must translate MFNs to PFNs
> when clearing _PAGE_PRESENT and translate PFNs to MFNs when setting
> _PAGE_PRESENT.
>
> His suggested fix converted p[te|md]_[set|clear]_flags to using
> paravirt-friendly ops but this is overkill. He suggested an alternative of
> using p[te|md]_modify in the NUMA page table operations but this is does
> more work than necessary and would require looking up a VMA for protections.
>
> This patch modifies the NUMA page table operations to use paravirt friendly
> operations to set/clear the flags of interest. Unfortunately this will take
> a performance hit when updating the PTEs on CONFIG_PARAVIRT but I do not
> see a way around it that does not break Xen.
Acked-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
It passed my mprotect() PROT_NONE -> PROT_READ test case so
Tested-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
I'll leave it up to the x86 maintainers to decide which fix to take.
This one or the more generic "x86: use pv-ops in
{pte,pmd}_{set,clear}_flags()"
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists