[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo6KuYLaoEsxR4jJQ98P23kNEMzMcu_-RyM3nWd6YRxgag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 12:27:16 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Mark Lord <mlord@...ox.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: driver skip pci_set_master, fix it? No.
[+cc Ben, linux-pci]
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Mark Lord <mlord@...ox.com> wrote:
> I am working a couple of drivers for chips that perform extensive bus-mastering ops.
> These including full SRIOV support, and allow assigning virtual functions to virtual machines, etc.
>
> One thing the driver (still in development) does for safety,
> is defer the call to pci_set_master() until *after* it has mapped
> the MMIO space of the chips, so it can reset/flush the DMA engines
> before giving them permission to scribble over host RAM.
>
> But a recent patch to the kernel has removed this from the driver's control.
> The core PCI now does pci_set_master() immediately on pci_enable_device().
I assume you're talking about the one added by cf3e1feba7f9 ("PCI:
Workaround missing pci_set_master in pci drivers"), but as far as I
can tell, it only calls pci_set_master() for *bridge* devices. What
am I missing? Is pci_set_master() being called for your endpoint?
What path is that?
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists