[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140408190625.GQ7292@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 20:06:26 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Linux-X86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Noonan <steven@...inklabs.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Use an alternative to _PAGE_PROTNONE for
_PAGE_NUMA v2
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:55:22AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> >
> > I picked a solution. The posted series uses a different bit.
>
> Yes, and I actually like that. I have nothing against your patch
> series. I'm ranting and raving because you then seemed to say "maybe
> we shouldn't pick a solution after all" when you said:
>
> > > If you are ok with leaving _PAGE_NUMA as _PAGE_PROTNONE
>
> which was what I reacted to.
>
Ok, my bad. To be absolutly clear I want to move away from aliasing the
_PAGE_PROTNONE bit. As David reports the series works for him, I'll wait
a bit to see if there are objections or an alternative patch series from
another direction. If not, I'll remove the RFC and repost it through the
x86 maintainers.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists