linux-kernel - RE: 3.0 -> 3.10 regression? poweroff instead of reboot?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B1AFB7D28@HASMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 Apr 2014 06:56:04 +0000
From:	"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To:	Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz>
CC:	"Greg KH (gregkh@...uxfoundation.org)" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: 3.0 -> 3.10 regression? poweroff instead of reboot?



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikola Ciprich [mailto:nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 09:50
> To: Winkler, Tomas
> Cc: Greg KH (gregkh@...uxfoundation.org); linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Nikola
> Ciprich
> Subject: Re: 3.0 -> 3.10 regression? poweroff instead of reboot?
> > Sorry for asking but can you please double check your compilation setup.
> 
> You're right of course :-(
> 
> I tried rebuilding rpm again now, and patch spits following:
> 
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 105 (offset -2 lines).
> patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line
> 
> it's bad rpm build didn't abort at this point, but apparently
> this is patch's fault:
> 
> [root@...6 linux-3.10]# cat /tmp/mei/1 | patch -sp1
> patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line
> [root@...6 linux-3.10]# echo $?
> 0
> 
> :-(
> 
> well, this sucks, I really wouldn't expect that kind of bug in such widely
> used program as patch :(
>
> I'll report that.


> (btw this error was caused by one whitespace character at last line of patch)

This is really strange, can it be that your mailer has introduced some blanks into the patch,
I've checked that patch applies to all relevant stable kernels.
 
> anyways, You can certainly forgot about that, it was my fault :(
> 
> sorry about that

No harm done, it's good this was sorted out.
Thanks
Tomas
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/