linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] edac: synopsys: Added EDAC support for zynq ddr ecc controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140409110339.GF6529@pd.tnic>
Date:	Wed, 9 Apr 2014 13:03:39 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	punnaiah choudary kalluri <punnaia@...inx.com>
Cc:	Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri <punnaiah.choudary.kalluri@...inx.com>,
	dougthompson@...ssion.com, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
	"michal.simek@...inx.com" <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	"pawel.moll@....com" <pawel.moll@....com>,
	"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, sorenb@...inx.com,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Punnaiah Choudary <kpc528@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] edac: synopsys: Added EDAC support for zynq ddr
 ecc controller

On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:34:31AM +0530, punnaiah choudary kalluri wrote:
> Since it is recommended in Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt
> but also said it is low priority and at the discretion of the MAINTAINER of
> that kernel source file
> 
> So, if you recommend not use kernel-doc annotation then i will take care
> in next version.

I don't think there's need for documenting those functions for
kernel-doc - it is an EDAC driver and not some subsystem function with a
lot of users.

> devm_ioremap_resource function will check this condition, so not
> checking for the NULL explicitly

And it would say

	dev_err(dev, "invalid resource\n");

so we'll know what fails, ok.

> Since the probe returns error, it it that the devm_ framework will
> clean these resources automatically?

Ah, that's the managed thing, ok.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/